Gandhi did not claim to be a prophet or even a philosopher. "There is no such thing as Gandhism," he warned, "and I do not want to leave any sect after me." There was only one Gandhian, he said, an imperfect one at that: himself.
The real significance of the Indian freedom movement in Gandhi’s eyes was that it was waged nonviolently. He would have had no interest in it if the Indian National Congress had adopted Satyagraha and subscribed to nonviolence. He objected to violence not only because an unarmed people had little chance of success in an armed rebellion, but because he considered violence a clumsy weapon which created more problems than it solved, and left a trail of hatred and bitterness in which genuine reconciliation was almost impossible.
By B. R. Nanda, Gandhi And Nonviolence. retrived from http://www.mkgandhi.org/nonviolence/gandhi_and_non.htm
mrholtshistory. (2008, april 13). Gandhi-The Philosophy of Nonviolence. [Video file]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkHTbkPoEQ8
Tatiana, I think you have done and excellent job. Remember to give references of images.
ResponderEliminarI think that in this time of crisis, we need leaders with different ways of doing politics and innovative ideas, like the case of Ghandi that first used nonviolence forces to lead a country towards a peaceful environment.
ResponderEliminarTatiana, What happened with your Blog? No task were done for the 2nd assessment.
ResponderEliminar